We
continue our series of interviews with scientists studying humanity's impact on
the planet.
Helping us understand the topic of sustainability is Robert (Bob) Brinkmann, Director
of Sustainability Studies at Hofstra University and the Director of
Sustainability Research at the National Center for Suburban Studies. He is also a consultant with the United Nations on sustainability issues.
In addition, Dr. Brinkmann is a professor in Hofstra University's Department of Geology, Environment and Sustainability. He chairs the Board of the National Cave and Karst Research Institute and is an Associate Editor for the Journal of Cave and Karst Studies. His new book, Florida Sinkholes: Science and Policy, will be published this year and is available from the University of Press of Florida here. Born in 1961, Dr. Brinkmann is a native of Wisconsin.
In addition, Dr. Brinkmann is a professor in Hofstra University's Department of Geology, Environment and Sustainability. He chairs the Board of the National Cave and Karst Research Institute and is an Associate Editor for the Journal of Cave and Karst Studies. His new book, Florida Sinkholes: Science and Policy, will be published this year and is available from the University of Press of Florida here. Born in 1961, Dr. Brinkmann is a native of Wisconsin.
Dr. Robert Brinkmann
|
Catholic Ecology: The word
"sustainability" is used more and more frequently among environmentalists and
policy makers. What is sustainability?
Dr. Brinkmann: Sustainability is basically using
resources today so that they are around for future generations. It is an
outgrowth of the conservation movement of the 20th century. However, it
encompasses elements of environment, economic development, and social justice.
In the past, most conservation professionals were focused on protecting
the environment. Now, we are concerned with not only the environment, but
also with ensuring that our actions are fair and provide reasonable economic
opportunities.
Sustainability grew in reaction to the
globalization trends of the 80's and 90's. We saw widespread expansion of
economic opportunities during this time. However, we also saw widespread
environmental degradation and pollution as well as an expansion of economic
disparities.
It is important to note that sustainability
science relies on quantitative analysis of success. For many years
environmentalists were criticized as "tree huggers" because we were
emotionally connected to the environment and didn't have strong science to back
up our activism. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being a tree hugger. I'm one. However, our modern sustainability science allows us to
measure the impacts of our actions on the planet and model our actions to
understand how they will impact us for generations.
CE: It sounds like sustainability is often
considered to be a large-scale reality—the choices made by governments and
companies and communities. How would the average person—a home or
small business owner—think about sustainability in their own lives?
Dr. Brinkmann: There is that old phrase, "think
globally, act locally." That is so true today in our smaller and smaller
world. We can each make individual choices that allow us to live more
simply and in tune with nature. We do not have to buy into the
consumerist tendencies in our culture that encourage us to buy more and more.
I think it is also important to be a good example for others. We
should teach our skills, get involved in our community, write, and help others.
Some simple day-to-day things we can do might
include: drive less, plant a garden, reduce the waste you produce, and
volunteer to help others. Try to measure the impact you are having in
these choices. How much less gas did you consumer over the year?
How much food did you produce? How many hours did you volunteer?
As far as small businesses, there are so many
options! I think one of the most important things that a business can do
is to look at the nature of their business to try to find ways to limit their
impact on the environment through all actions. There are many consultants
that will help green small businesses. Plus, there are also lots of
professional networking organizations that will help. Some communities
have green small business certifications as well.
CE: What does the data show about how various
nations are factoring sustainability into their policies, laws, and
educational systems? And what obstacles are they finding?
Dr. Brinkmann: I've been looking at the range of
sustainability practices taking place around the world for a project I am doing
with the United Nations and it is really impressive to see how much work there
is around the world on sustainability. Overall, most nations are looking
at things like life expectancy, improvement of education, and reduction of
poverty. They are also making significant strides on things like ensuring
biodiversity and building sustainable development policies within national
priorities. Indeed, most nations have developed reports outlining their
progress.
The biggest obstacle, especially for the poorer
nations, is funding. For example, how does one move toward green energy
in some nations when they do not have funds to invest in an updated grid system
or the solar or wind farms that will supply the energy. We certainly face
these issues in the United States, so you can imagine how difficult it is in
the developing world.
CE: Are there any common themes among the nations?
Dr. Brinkmann: Besides the ones mentioned above,
most nations are heavily focused on building green energy and a sustainable and
healthy water supply. Most of the nations are also looking toward the
focus on sustainability as a form of economic development. We've done
this here in the United States to a certain extent by investing in solar and
wind farms. Many are also concerned with ensuring that all of their
citizens are engaged with sustainable development to ensure that it is fair and
equitable.
CE: What are some of the striking differences?
Dr. Brinkmann: I think that the most striking difference is
actually in the U.S. We are one of the few nations of the world that
doesn't have a strong sustainability program. We have it somewhat
fragmented in the different cabinet offices of the United States, but we really
don't have strong national goals like other nations. I'm not saying we
don't have individual goals in things like green energy, but we don't approach
sustainability comprehensively. As a result, the best approaches to
sustainability planning and management are at the local or national level.
That is why we see that individual cities or states are very focused on
things like setting goals for greenhouse gas reduction or improving access to
healthy food.
CE: Does the data show if cultural world views
impact a nation's engagement on sustainability?
Dr. Brinkmann: Absolutely. There are a few nations of the world that are not fully engaged with the modern sustainability movement because they see it as a new form of capitalist oppression. However, by far, most nations are involved with sustainability in some way and many have developed their own unique approaches. There are two great examples. Bhutan, for instance, has developed a sustainability index called the Gross National Happiness Index. The indicators that focus more on social justice and quality of life. The Canadian approach to measuring sustainability includes a range of standard indicators associated with environment, equity, and environmental protection. But it also includes things like access to live entertainment and national parks as well as reduction of diseases associated with the West, like diabetes. Many nations have developed individualized sustainability indicators and plans that fit their needs and that reflect their culture.
CE: China and India are getting a lot of attention
as fast-growing nations seeking to employ millions by adopting Western
industrial economies. This is causing significant environmental issues. What
has your work shown about sustainability thought in those nations?
Dr. Brinkmann: Both of these nations are rapidly
developing and are confronting the issues of development faced in the
1950's and 1960's in the United States. I do research in China and I have
found that China is getting very serious about sustainable development. One of the challenges that China faces, however, is that they do not have
a strong history of non-profit activity or social activism. We know that
in the U.S., these are major drivers of environmental policy. In China,
most of the environmental policy is coming directly from the government that
also encourages economic development. It will be interesting to see how
the environmental institutions evolve in this unique setting.
CE: What was the biggest surprise found in your
research?
Dr. Brinkmann: I was surprised by how many sustainability
projects are taking place all over the world. We often think that we are
leading the way on a number of things in the United States. In this case,
we are following the rest of the world. We do some amazing things, but we
do not have a comprehensive sustainability vision at the national level.
We are much more fragmented in our approach.
CE: If you had to give an award to the nation
with the best sustainable practices, which would it be?
Dr. Brinkmann: I would actually give it to New York City.
While not a nation, I think that your readers would get a better
understanding about the way that sustainability is actualized by taking a look
at New York's sustainability plan here. It is highly quantitative and addresses the major themes of sustainability.
Think what we could do if we had a national conversation about this!
I think a better way of thinking about sustainability for those who are nervous about more government is to think about how we can change our government to do better. Do governments really need to build more roads or do we need to build more sustainable transportation options? Do we need to subsidize big agricultural companies or do we need to subsidize the small farmer? Do we need to subsidize dirty energy or subsidize green energy? It is not about building more government. Instead it is getting our governments to refocus resources on the issues that will allow us to have a more sustainable future.
I also want to stress that it's not all about
government. It is about changing our lifestyle from the hyper consumer
world we live in into a more intentional thoughtful life that examines our role
in the world and the impacts of our choices.
How about we don't subsidize anyone...bring back Farm Freedom and Food Freedom. Revitalize the local communities and embed food processing back into the communities. Quit the fossil fuel intensive Corn and Bean production and promote pasture based farming.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ted.com/talks/allan_savory_how_to_green_the_world_s_deserts_and_reverse_climate_change.html