The third in our occasional series on the ecological sciences looks at biodiversity and the extinction of species. What is biodiversity and why is it important? What do the numbers tell us about how much of it we're losing and why?
Answering these and other question is Dr. Peter Raven, an active member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and one
of the world's leading botanists and advocates of conservation and
biodiversity. For four decades until 2010, Dr. Raven headed the Missouri
Botanical Garden, an institution he nurtured into a world-class center for
botanical research and education and horticultural display. Described by Time
magazine as a "Hero for the Planet," Dr. Raven champions research
around the world to preserve endangered plants and is a leading advocate for
conservation and a sustainable environment.
Dr. Peter Raven Photo courtesy of the Missouri Botanical Garden |
In recognition of his work in science and conservation, Dr. Raven is the recipient of numerous prizes. He also served for twelve years as home secretary of the National Academy of Sciences and is a member of the academies of science in Argentina, Brazil, China, Denmark, India, Italy, Mexico, Russia, Sweden, the U.K., and several other countries. The author of numerous books and reports, both popular and scientific, Dr. Raven co-wrote "Biology of Plants," an internationally best-selling textbook, now in its sixth edition. He also co-authored "Environment," a leading textbook on the environment.
CE: What exactly is
biodiversity and why is it important?
Dr. Raven: Biodiversity is the total
diversity of all plants, animals, fungi, of all life forms making up the living
systems on Earth. And it’s all the variations within these systems, genetic and
otherwise, such as how various environments make similar organisms look
different and grow differently.
This
diversity is important for several reasons. Fundamentally, we depend entirely
on the planet’s living systems for survival. We’re a part of these systems and
we cannot exist without them. The better we understand how the systems of life
work, the more sustainably we can live. The less we know, the more likely we’re
going to continue causing irreparable damage to Earth’s ecosystems.
We
should think of all life forms as the endowment of our earth—it’s what we've been given. We have a moral obligation to understand life and manage the
systems of life sustainably. In Genesis 2, verse 15, it is written
“God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of
it.” How well are we doing with that
mandate to care for the earth, written at a time when the total number of
humans on this planet was less than ten percent of what it is now?
Practically
speaking, all food comes from plants, directly or indirectly. Ninety percent of
our food relies on just over one hundred types of plants. The concern is what happens when we see
continued losses of plant species. It’s estimated that one-third of all of the
estimated 425,000 kinds of plants could disappear in six or seven decades, which
would be about the same percentage of extinction as we estimate for other organisms.
Also,
two-thirds of the people in the world depend directly on plants as medicine, many
of them in China and India. And about a quarter of our prescription drugs were
discovered from plants or are still extracted from them. Of course, we've only
looked at a small proportion of the plants.
Tambopata River in the Peruvian Amazon
Photo:
Flicker/kingjn
|
CE: What should people know
about the findings of research into biodiversity loss and species extinction?
Dr. Raven: Species are disappearing
more rapidly than they have in past 65 million years—and the rate is
accelerating. And we’re causing this increase in a number of ways: the
destruction of natural habitats; bringing invasive species into ecosystems; climate change, all caused by a combination of our own population growth and even
more rapidly rising consumption levels; and destructive technologies, which drive
the overall rate of extinction. In consideration of these factors, a very high
rate of extinction is unavoidable. There
are three people on earth for every one person who was alive when I was born in
the mid-1930s!
CE: How do researchers
determine rates of extinction—how do we know species are disappearing so
quickly?
First
we study the fossil record to determine rates of extinction over very long
periods of time, using kinds of organisms that are well represented in the
fossil record. We also have some five hundred years of printed books. There is
lots we can learn from what’s been written down over those centuries. And then
we look around and see which species aren't there anymore. In comparing all
this data, we can measure trends and easily conclude the rate of extinction is
several orders of magnitude higher than what it has been historically.
CE: It sometimes seems that
when asked about ecological problems, people often think first of climate
change, running out of fresh water, and water or air pollution as issues of
primary concern. Do you believe that issues of biodiversity are given the
attention that they are due? Or are they so linked with other issues that any
discussion of environmental damage ultimately speaks to losses in biodiversity?
Dr. Raven: Biodiversity and species
loss can be difficult to grasp. The concept of so many species, most of which you
never see, disappearing, is a kind of abstraction. It’s difficult for people to
get excited about something that just doesn't seem to come into focus in their
daily lives.
CE: Where has research focused
in the past decade and why?
Dr. Raven: There’s a few important
areas. One area being researched is in trying to inventory species, to the extent
that it can be done. Not counting bacteria, which no one can estimate, there
are probably more than twelve million species on Earth—plants, animals,
fungi, and microorganisms taken together—and not quite two million have even
been recognized and named. And so researchers are trying to build up this list,
focusing on groups that are obvious—butterflies, mammals, birds, and
mosquitoes, which are important to know about since they are so effective at
spreading diseases. By studying these relatively well-known groups we can gain a picture of the pattern of
distribution of life on earth. And we’re also trying to get sampling of less
obvious groups of life, too, to round out the picture. We can do this partly by
comparing their patterns of abundance and distribution with those about which
we know much more.
Photo:Flicker/USFWSmidwest |
There
is also a lot of research in the metabolism and genetic characteristics of organisms,
to see how they function and how they may be modified for agriculture. Such
modifications to the molecular makeup of the organisms can take place in any
number of ways, one of which is genetic modification. There is a lot of
discussion about this but most scientists are comfortable that genetic
modification is not dangerous. In
general, climate change and the increased need for food—an estimated one
billion people are malnourished now, and our overall population is projected to
grow from the current 7.2 billion to 11 billion at the end of the century—will require us to intensify our research into agriculture and improve our
agricultural practices greatly.
CE: What can future research
help us better understand?
Dr. Raven: In a practical sense we’d
like to see as many kinds of organisms as possible be preserved for the future,
and to keep as much of their genetic variation as we can as well. That would
involve a lot more effort than currently underway. The pressure on the biosphere is enormous already,
and then you add our population increase and climate change, it will be increasingly
difficult for us to maintain our stock of biodiversity in as complete a state as
possibly. In the light of these trends, it is of enormous importance for the
preservation of human civilization in the future to save as many organisms as
we can, especially those of obvious and particular importance for the
functioning of their ecosystems, or for us for special reasons—such as their role in
food or medicine, for example.
CE: What steps can governments, civil associations, and individuals take to respond to issues of biodiversity loss?
Dr. Raven: People can learn more
about how their actions impact global sustainability. A particularly useful reference for learning
is the website of the Global Footprint Network.
We must all think much more internationally than we do now. People can learn continuously, to keep their knowledge up to date, about what is happening to the biosphere and then act on what they come to understand. They can teach their children about biodiversity. Most children are very interested in plants and animals when they are young but they often move on to other considerations as they get older.
We must all think much more internationally than we do now. People can learn continuously, to keep their knowledge up to date, about what is happening to the biosphere and then act on what they come to understand. They can teach their children about biodiversity. Most children are very interested in plants and animals when they are young but they often move on to other considerations as they get older.
Governments
can take a wide variety of actions. They can preserve
land; develop policies to stop burning inefficient fuels; they can encourage switching
to more sustainable methods of food production; they can learn more about
organisms in their own borders, and encourage other nations to do the same.
They can sponsor many forms of consumption that are less destructive than the
ones that are widespread now
The
world’s poor will clearly suffer the most because of losses in biodiversity. Their
habitats are typically the ones decimated, their agricultural systems
deteriorating, the wild plants and animals on which they depend decreases in
abundance and all of the conditions of their lives changing for reasons over
which they have no control. The
situation is plainly morally unacceptable. It’s more than just the effect on indigenous peoples; it’s a matter of
the plight of poor people in general that we need to consider.
Especially disadvantaged are often women and children, who in many societies are not brought in to the power structures and given the opportunity to contribute what they could to our overall benefit. When you have more than one hundred million people worldwide at the edge of starvation at any given time, small changes to ecosystems have big impacts. Our consumption levels in the industrialized world, our expectation of an ever-growing prosperity, are increasing based on importing goods from countries less fortunate than ours, and will be even more so in the future if we continue on the present track.This is simply, in a Biblical sense, not taking care to the slightest degree of those less fortunate than ourselves.
Especially disadvantaged are often women and children, who in many societies are not brought in to the power structures and given the opportunity to contribute what they could to our overall benefit. When you have more than one hundred million people worldwide at the edge of starvation at any given time, small changes to ecosystems have big impacts. Our consumption levels in the industrialized world, our expectation of an ever-growing prosperity, are increasing based on importing goods from countries less fortunate than ours, and will be even more so in the future if we continue on the present track.This is simply, in a Biblical sense, not taking care to the slightest degree of those less fortunate than ourselves.
CE: What has been your
greatest frustration in both researching and teaching this (or related) topics?
Dr. Raven: People are preoccupied by
daily life. They don’t take time to reflect on how as a group they impact the larger
world. Politicians don’t like to be unpopular, and telling people the truth
about their collective effects on the functioning of the earth and what would
need to be done, partly by much stronger cooperation between nations than we
enjoy now, will always be unpopular. People naturally want more and more for
themselves and their families, but when there are so very many of us with such
high and ever-increasing demands, it just doesn't work.
One
tragic aspect of our lives is that people operate as if their possibilities for
consumption are unlimited. This has to change. We need alternate kinds of
economies that do not depend on endless growth in a world that cannot support
such growth. We need to develop a lot
more concern and love for all the people of the earth. Without such changes, there is no hope of
solving the enormous problems that we are facing together.
Of
course, we will eventually live sustainably, because there is no other option:
we can’t go on indefinitely, the way we are. The question is, how much will be
left after we consume so much? How much of the world, the joy of the world, has
already been decimated and lost permanently? And how much more beautiful, more
prosperous, more joyful can it be if we get busy and understand what we’re
doing and preserve what we have now to a much greater degree than we might otherwise?
CE: What has been your greatest joy in your work?
Dr. Raven: People are starting to
appreciate the problem more and more.
In
the 1950s, very few people were concerned about the need for conserving natural
resources or biodiversity. And if you
think about it, it’s only been a short time since we had wide open frontiers,
when everything seemed endless. Now we’re realizing the importance of individual
responsibility. People have been taking action as we know more about species
losses and see the results of our lifestyles. At the end, it’s a Biblical lesson—concern for those less fortunate
than ourselves, moderation in our own lives, conserving rather than
destroying. It’s just that the need for
applying such principles has become so much greater.
CE: Lastly, is there anything
you’d like to add that we haven’t covered?
People often don’t
naturally want to do what they have to when they accept what science is telling
us about our lifestyles. People don’t always want to think about the future.
But you have to when the science is showing us what will happen if we stay on
our present course.
Science doesn't tell you not to jump off thirty-story building. It just says what will
happen if you do.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting. No input or question is too small. You're encouraged to be passionate, feisty, and humorous. But do so with civility, please.